That is, unless you anticipate having users that are running Windows DOS (which has been outdated for about 30 years now!) There is no real difference between the two.

Which Is Better: JPG or JPEG?Īs we said above, they are functionally the exact same thing. These are also both exactly the same file types and have the same history as JPG/JPEG because Microsoft systems couldn’t use the 4 letter MPEG extension. However, old habits die hard and many people still use both file names.Īs a fun side note: if you watch or edit video files on your computer, you have probably used. Today, Windows supports file types with more than 3 letter extensions so has no issue with using JPEGs. So, in order for Windows to use JPEGs, the file type was renamed to JPG on Windows systems.īoth are exactly the same otherwise. They could use file types with a four letter extension, meaning. Unix-based systems like Mac or Linux didn’t have this issue. This meant that JPEG files could not be used, as they have a 4 letter extension. However, in the past (prior to Windows 95), Microsoft operating systems could only use file types that were 3 letters long or less. JPEG was the original name of the file type. The reason has to do with the Microsoft Windows operating system. So, what’s the difference between JPG and JPEG? The short answer: absolutely nothing, other than the name. Wrapping Up Our Discussion of JPG and JPEG JPG vs.Frequently Asked Questions Around JPG/JPEG.How to Convert PNGs, GIFs, and Other File Types to JPG/JPEG.

How to edit jpeg in mac